Detectives Online

Civil Justice Versus Criminal Justice

http://2jumpstart.recreg.hop.clickbank.net/

How has the American justice system transformed so amazingly over the last few decades? The answer could be a very complex problem to identify.

Are these changes due to an increasingly larger number of attorneys that have entered the marketplace? Is it because the burden of proof is so undeniably different in the two courts of the law? Or could it be because the capitalistic system that we live in is so dependent upon money that we as a society have to determine blame and assign a dollar amount to it?

Reading fiction books as well as watching network and cable television contributed to my thinking process. The American public including the media has a fixation with murder and death. If you and the vast majority of Americans are like me, then you probably haven't come across murder and shootouts and street killings unless you are on the front line of law enforcement and need to work those crime scenes on a daily basis.

A couple of trials over the last ten to twelve years that garnered nationwide attention also started my mind thinking in overdrive. Both occurred in the Southern California area. They were the trials of O. J. Simpson and Robert Blake.

In each case the aforementioned parties were acquitted of the criminal charges that had been brought against them. Each escaped prosecution from murder on the criminal side of the law. However, on the civil side of the law each was held responsible for actions that contributed to the deaths of the victims. An arbitrary monetary amount was determined in civil court for those two people to pay to the relatives of the victims. When you stop and think about it, how bizarre can that be?

That came about because the burden of proof is so remarkably different in the two courts of law. On the criminal side the burden of proof is so extraordinarily difficult to prove without a shadow of a doubt. Because of that we have lawless individuals walking the streets of our society because they have attorneys that are adept at putting a seed of doubt in the minds of jurors. Only one juror and in some instances two, can hang a jury or force acquittal. On the civil side only a simple majority or in some instance two-thirds of the jurors can determine the monetary damages that the accused should pay.

Let's take a second and examine the two sides of law and put the differences in layman's terms. There has been a crime or action committed. In a criminal court of law the government brings the case against the accused. In a civil court of law the parties are two private individuals. In a criminal case the court must decide if the accused has violated a statute against society as a whole. In a civil case the court must determine if one person has caused harm against another.

To take this example further, the penalty in a criminal court of law is punishment or some sort of rehabilitation. In a civil court of law the remedy is monetary compensation for the loss that was sustained. To accomplish all of this the prosecutor in a criminal court must prove without a reasonable doubt that the accused has committed the crime. In a civil court the plaintiff merely has to prove that the preponderance of evidence supports the claim.

That offers some sort of explanation as to why the outcome in both the O. J. Simpson case and the Robert Blake case caused two glaringly different conclusions. In both cases the criminal prosecutors for the government could not prove without a reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crimes. However, in a civil court the attorneys for the plaintiffs were able to prove through a preponderance of evidence that the defendants were responsible for the deaths of the victims. Hence the court awarded monetary damages to be paid by the defendant to the relatives of the victims.

The crime of murder and the fixation on that crime by our society is one example of how the two courts operate differently. But let's look at a different crime that occurs in our society. Let's look at a case of fraud. This could also be explained as a subtle crime, commonly referred to as white-collar crime. It is so different from a murder or a bank robbery.

In a criminal court a crime such as fraud is also extremely difficult for prosecutors to prove. Plus the crime would have needed to be against the government before any charges were filed anyway. And even though the preponderance of evidence in theory works in a civil court, it is so difficult for a defrauded individual to come up with the resources to prove that a fraudulent action occurred.

Under that scenario the defrauded party, who more than likely was cleaned out financially must come up with the money to afford a legal team. In all likelihood they must also fund a team of private investigators. In the meantime, the person that committed the fraudulent act has the financial gains from the fraudulent act to successfully deter any efforts to collect damages. In that set of circumstances the deck of cards is stacked against the plaintiff that is filing suit against a defendant.

Take it one step further. Pick up an entertaining book titled "Lifetime Loser" by James Ross pertaining to this concept and see how it is applied to the game of golf ? specifically nicknamed the "gentleman's game." It deals with the two separate courts of law and the crime of fraud.

The book might also serve as a notice that there are other crimes in our society that should have as much if not more attention given to them than just the act of murder. Fraud and white-collar crime can ruin lives just as easily. An aspect of the story examines one characters journey through the civil court system and the hurdles that it presents. See how the preponderance of evidence collected by a plaintiff can be difficult to bring forth. In many ways it can be as complex in civil court as the burden of proof is for a prosecutor in criminal court.

Jim Ross, a University of Missouri-Columbia graduate went to a keyboard and let the words flow through his fingertips. Lifetime Loser is his first novel. Creative energies will dictate whether or not another story is to be told. Visit Lifetime Loser.

http://2jumpstart.recreg.hop.clickbank.net/

MORE ARTICLES:

It's Important To Get Your Hands On A Certified Copy Of Birth Certificate
A spill over of our technological era is the increasing importance attached to identification.

ASPCA Unveils Mobile Animal Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) Unit
ASPCA also announces additional initiatives in its ongoing commitment to fight animal cruelty.

Employers Are Encouraged to Investigate Further When Doing Background Checks on Job Candidates
Recruiting firm gives answers to questions employers may have regarding conducting more detailed background checks on job applicants.

Get Out of Jail Free: How to Identify Unconscious Beliefs
Know thyself.These words were inscribed in the vestibule of the Temple of Apollo at Delphi.

Tips For Divorce And Custody Conflicts
Conflict before, during and after a divorce is inevitable. Yet, if the conflict continues, you'll never reach an agreement. Over 95% of all divorce cases ultimately settle, so you'll deal with the conflict sooner or later. It's helpful if you can learn to deal with conflict in a way that won't make you crazy, and can help you learn to get along with your ex-spouse enough so that you can work out your settlement, share your children, and deal with the everyday problems that will arise in the meantime and afterwards.

Prison Minister Comments on Paris Hilton's Recent Incarceration and California's Prison Problems
Prison Minister and author Marty Angelo answers a Hollywood reporter's tough questions, including: "Can Paris Hilton make it in her 'New Beginning' outside of jail?"

The Roles And Duties Of The Crime Analyst In The Criminal Justice Field
A crime analyst is as important to the criminal justice field as the police officers who make the arrest This profession is one of the most interesting and intriguing fields of study that is available

Anna Nicole Smith: Criminal Activity and Drug Trafficking May Impact on Custody of Dannielynn Smith: A Legal Analysis
Criminal investigations about Anna Nicole Smith and Daniel Smith, and the likely impact on Howard Stern and Larry Birkhead in the March 16, 2007 Bahamas custody case.

Divorce & Child Custody
There are two types of custody, ?legal? and ?physical.? Do not confuse them. They mean very different things

They Will Make It Happen: Child Custody Lawyers In Washington Dc
Another broken heart in Washington DC!

American Bar Association Weighs In On Access To Courts For Military Personnel, Federal Judicial Nomination Process And International Criminal Court
The American Bar Association's House of Delegates approved recommendations relating to expanding military members' access to the courts, encouraging bipartisan commissions to evaluate prospective judicial candidates and urging the U.S. government to expand its interaction with the International Criminal Court.

Weight of Marijuana and Criminal and Tax Law
Conclusive research has shown that wet (uncured) marijuana is not psychoactive. Before drying, decarboxylation of inactive THCA acid into delta9 THC has not yet occurred.

Kevin M. Weeks Blends Urban Fiction with a Twist of Crime Fiction in Sophomore Novel
Award winning author Kevin M. Weeks incorporates the best elements of Urban Fiction and Crime Fiction together in his sophomore novel titled: The Street Life Series: Is It Passion or Revenge?

Dramatically Increase The Odds You Walk Away The Victor In A Sporting Event... Or A Criminal Assault
If you watched as the US military prosecuted the last two major campaigns in the war on terror (Afghanistan and Iraq) you saw an incredible improvement in both the efficiency and effectiveness of this war machine.Both campaigns were won quickly with minimal loss of US life and nominal damage to non-military targets (compared to previous campaigns of this size).